Mark R. Levin::Men In Black: How the Supreme Court Is Destroying America
From R-KIDS of MN and GPF
Contents |
Men In Black: How the Dupreme Court is Destroying America
This book is available from Amazon
Introduction
The Supreme Court endorses sodomy, terrorist rights, and importing foreign law.
Are these in the Constitution? You’re right: They’re not. But these days the Constitution is no restraint on our out-of-control Supreme Court – a Court that imperiously strikes down laws and imposes new ones purely on its own arbitrary whims. There’s a word for that: tyranny. In Men in Black: How the Supreme Court is Destroying America, radio talk show host and legal scholar Mark Levin dissects the judicial tyranny that is robbing us of our freedoms and stuffing the ballot box in favor of liberal policies. If you’ve ever wondered why – no matter who holds political power – American society always seems to drift to the left, Levin has the answer: the black-robed justices of the Supreme Court, subverting democracy in favor of their own liberal views. In throwing the book at our own judicial system – in particular, American judges who ignore the Constitution and dismantle the rights of American citizens in everyday court proceedings – Levin shares jaw-dropping examples of judicial power grabs and liberal power plays by judges, whose decades of judicial activism have made the Supreme Court the most potent threat to American freedom.
From the Inside Flap
The Supreme Court Endorses Terrorists' Rights, Flag Burning, and Importing Foreign Law. Is that in the Constitution?
Amazon Book Description
From Amazon.com:
Conservative talk radio host, lawyer, and frequent National Review contributor Mark R. Levin comes out firing against the United States Supreme Court in Men in Black, accusing the institution of corrupting the ideals of America's founding fathers. The court, in Levin's estimation, pursues an ideology-based activist agenda that oversteps its authority within the government. Levin examines several decisions in the court's history to illustrate his point, beginning with the landmark Marbury v. Madison case, wherein the court granted itself the power to declare acts of the other branches of government unconstitutional. He devotes later chapters to other key cases culminating in modern issues such as same-sex marriage and the McCain-Feingold campaign finance reform bill. Like effective attorneys do, Levin packs in copious research material and delivers his points with tremendous vigor, excoriating the justices for instances where he feels strict const! itutional constructivism gave way to biased interpretation. But Levin's definition of "activism" seems inconsistent. In the case of McCain-Feingold, the court declined to rule on a bill already passed by congress and signed by the president, but Levin, who thinks the bill violates the First Amendment, still accuses them of activism even when they were actually passive. To his talk-radio listeners, Levin's hard-charging style and dire warnings of the court's direction will strike a resonant tone of alarm, though the hyperbole may be a bit off-putting to the uninitiated. As an attack on the vagaries of decisions rendered by the Supreme Court and on some current justices, Men in Black scores points and will likely lead sympathetic juries to conviction.
--John Moe
